Rechercher dans ce blog

Wednesday, July 6, 2022

More flights are scheduled in the U.S. than air traffic control can handle, say authorities - CBC News

The U.S. aviation system is expected to "remain challenged this summer and beyond," and its federal regulator needs more air traffic control staff, a senior United Airlines executive said on Wednesday, echoing problems in Canada and Europe.

Travellers are already facing a tough summer with mounting flight cancellations amid rising demand as the industry tries to rebuild staff levels after thousands of workers left during the COVID-19 pandemic.

"The reality is that there are just more flights scheduled industry-wide than the [air traffic control] staffing system can handle," United's chief operations officer, Jon Roitman, said in a message to staff seen by Reuters.

"Until that is resolved, we expect the U.S. aviation system will remain challenged this summer and beyond."

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) responded, saying on Sunday and the holiday Monday, "there were no FAA staffing-related delays at all, yet airlines still canceled over 1,100 flights, a quarter of which were United Airlines flights."

The agency said it "will continue to meet our responsibility to hold airlines accountable, while standing ready to collaborate where appropriate so that Americans can confidently expect safe, reliable, and affordable service whenever they purchase an airline ticket."

A United Airlines plane sits near the terminal of the Ottawa International Airport in 2021. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who met June 16 with airline CEOs on summer travel issues, told CNBC on Tuesday that "air traffic control staffing issues do not explain the majority of delays and cancellations we've been seeing."

He cited as a key factor in flight issues the decision of airlines to push many pilots into early retirement despite $54 billion in COVID bailout funds.

European airlines hit by labour unrest

In Europe, strikes and staff shortages are forcing airlines to cancel thousands of flights and causing hours-long lineups at major airports, dashing hopes of a sizzling first summer after coronavirus lockdowns.

Paris airport workers will stage another walkout at the French capital's main international hub from July 8-10 to press their demand for a net monthly salary increase of 300 euro ($313.74 US).

WATCH | Canadian airlines among worst for delays, data shows: 

Canadian airlines among worst performers for delays, recent data shows

20 hours ago
Duration 1:48
Canada's two major airlines have had the poorest on-time performance of the 10 biggest North American airlines so far this summer, recent data shows. However, some experts say U.S. airlines experienced delays and disruptions last year due to a surge in demand for travel, and now, it’s Canada's turn.

Staff at an aviation fuel services firm at London's Heathrow Airport voted to carry out a strike over pay, the Unite union  said on Tuesday, with an initial 72-hour strike set to begin July 21.

Heathrow-based British Airways staff also plan to strike after the airline failed to roll back a 10 per cent pay cut imposed  during the pandemic, with the walkout expected to take place during the peak summer holiday period. On Tuesday, British Airways said it would reduce its April to October schedule by 11 per cent.

Several airlines have slashed their summer capacity to cope with the staff shortages, including thousands of cancellations by Lufthansa, easyJet and Air Canada.

Similar flight cuts and labour disputes have hit airlines in Spain, Portugal and other European countries. In Canada, experts say flight delays, cancellations and long lineups that have plagued airports in recent weeks are the result of labour shortages throughout the airline industry.

U.S. flight cuts

U.S. airlines have cut about 15 per cent of planned summer flights, an airline trade group said last month, while United Airlines has temporarily halted 12 per cent of departures from its Newark, N.J., hub alone because of congestion.

Over the four-day July 4 holiday weekend, 8.8 million passengers were screened by U.S. Transportation Security Agency checkpoints, topping 2020 and 2021, but about 12 per cent lower than 2019 levels.

Roitman said United performed better than major rivals over the holiday weekend but that "we still have some work to do to meet standards of reliability and operational performance."

WATCH | Widespread labour problems making airport chaos worse: 

Widespread labour issues making airport chaos worse, experts say

2 days ago
Duration 2:47
Experts say flight delays, cancellations and long lineups that have plagued Canadian airports in recent weeks are the result of labour shortages throughout the airline industry.

He added, "Yes, weather and air traffic constraints impacted the entire industry, but we've built a culture of 'no excuses' and we clearly have room to improve."

Last month, an airline industry trade group said the FAA must ensure adequate air traffic control staffing to avoid further summer travel disruptions, saying a key Florida ATC centre had been "understaffed for 27 of the last 30 days, which is crippling to the entire East Coast traffic flows."

Adblock test (Why?)


More flights are scheduled in the U.S. than air traffic control can handle, say authorities - CBC News
Read More

Fed Sees 'More Restrictive' Rates Possible If Inflation Persists - Bloomberg

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Fed Sees 'More Restrictive' Rates Possible If Inflation Persists  Bloomberg
  2. Fed sees 'more restrictive' policy as likely if inflation fails to come down, minutes say  CNBC
  3. Federal Reserve Prepares More Big Rate Hikes Amid Risk That High Inflation Could 'Become Entrenched'  Forbes
  4. Wall Street ends up as investors absorb Fed minutes  Reuters.com
  5. View Full coverage on Google News

Fed Sees 'More Restrictive' Rates Possible If Inflation Persists - Bloomberg
Read More

You're Working More. Here's How to Talk to Your Partner About It. - HBR.org Daily

Going the extra mile can be a great way to get ahead at work. Studies have shown that employees who engage in more “organizational citizenship behaviors” — that is, activities that benefit the organization such as working after normal business hours or during vacation, attending work-related functions on personal time, taking on special projects, and rearranging personal plans because of work — tend to receive higher performance evaluations and more rewards such as public recognition, salary increases, promotions, and high-profile projects.

But of course, going above and beyond in this way can also be stressful, tiring, and potentially unsustainable — indeed, the impact of going the extra mile on individual stress levels is well-documented. However, its implications for work-family conflict (and in particular, for employees’ relationships with their partners) are still largely unknown.

To explore how employees navigate the challenges that arise when attempting to balance responsibilities at home with going the extra mile at work, we conducted a series of quantitative and qualitative studies with more than 1,000 U.S.-based employees.

In our first two studies, we conducted in-depth interviews with 28 working couples as well as surveys with an additional 192 employees and their partners. We asked them how they communicated with their partners about unexpected, additional work demands, and identified five distinct communication strategies (in order from most to least commonly used):

  1. Providing early notice: Employees gave their partners advance warning that they would need to put in some extra work in the near future.
  2. Seeking permission: Employees asked their partners for permission to take on the extra work project.
  3. Negotiating logistics: Employees helped their partners deal with the potential burden that the additional work might create by supporting logistical needs (e.g., arranging for a babysitter, meal delivery, etc.).
  4. Projecting payoffs: Employees explained how going the extra mile at work would help their career, ultimately benefiting the entire family.
  5. Invoking prior conversations: Employees reminded their partners that they had previously agreed that sometimes they would have to prioritize the employee’s job.

Once we mapped out these strategies, we wanted to understand how they influenced both the dynamics at home and employees’ ultimate decisions around whether to pursue the extra work. We were particularly interested in how these strategies were related to work-family conflict (i.e., the extent to which the couple felt that the employee’s work interfered with their obligations at home) and partner satisfaction (i.e., the extent to which the partner felt that they had a satisfying, strong, and stable relationship with the employee).

Unsurprisingly, the first three strategies (which are more partner-oriented) were received the most positively by employees’ partners, and partners reacted most poorly to the last two strategies (which are more employee-oriented). This was further supported by a follow-up experiment with more than 900 participants in which we found that people were most satisfied when their partners gave early notice and sought permission to do extra work, and least satisfied when they invoked prior conversations. Similarly, we found that the more an employee reported invoking prior conversations, the more likely the couple was to experience work-family conflict.

However, while seeking permission might be a good approach as far as partner satisfaction is concerned, we found that the employees who took this approach were least likely to actually end up pursuing the extra work (perhaps because permission is not always granted, or because the act of asking dissuades employees from taking on the extra work). Conversely, those who projected payoffs and invoked prior conversations were most likely to actually go above and beyond for their organizations (perhaps because they felt that the benefits of taking on the work outweighed the costs, or because they felt that they already had tacit permission).

Of course, there are many factors that can influence both an employee’s decision to go the extra mile at work and their partner’s reaction to that decision. But we did control for many of these factors in our studies: For instance, we controlled for communication skills to ensure our findings reflected the impact of the specific communication strategy an employee used, not just how good they were at communicating in general. We also controlled for the type and amount of additional work being discussed, again to ensure we were measuring the impact of how people communicated about a certain behavior (rather than the behavior itself). And finally, when asking participants to describe how they’d react to different communication strategies, we described scenarios that were both energy depleting for the employee (e.g., staying late at work to complete an important assignment) and enriching (e.g., attending a client dinner, along with their partner, at their favorite restaurant). Understandably, people generally reported that they would react more positively to the more enriching scenario, but their satisfaction levels were still significantly influenced by the employee’s communication strategy — regardless of the scenario they described.

So, what should you do if your boss asks you to stay late for a special project, or call a client while on vacation? There are no easy answers, but we’ve identified four strategies to help you balance the sometimes-conflicting imperatives to go the extra mile at work and be a good partner at home:

1. Clarify whether extra work is actually required.

Employees often feel like extra work isn’t really optional. Even when we told the participants in our studies that an extra project was “not required,” many still assumed that they would be expected to do it. Moreover, many of the partners we talked to echoed this sentiment, expressing an assumption that their significant other had to go the extra mile in order to meet family goals and live up to the couple’s shared values and ideals.

But in many cases, going the extra mile really is extra. So especially if taking on additional work could cause problems at home, employees should clarify whether their organization really needs their help, whether the task is really as urgent as it might seem, and whether someone else could cover for them. For example, if your boss asks you to come to a client dinner on your day off, it’s worth double checking whether they really need you there, or they’re just extending an offer. Rather than jumping at every opportunity for additional work, employees should ask their managers to clarify which tasks are most important, which are nice-to-haves, and which are fully optional.

2. Engage in citizenship crafting.

Going the extra mile doesn’t have to mean saying yes to every special request — and in fact, it probably shouldn’t. Instead of feeling pressured to take on whatever extra work your boss throws your way, employees should engage in what’s called “citizenship crafting”: proactively finding ways to go beyond the call of duty that match your personal interests, strengths, and needs. For employees balancing work with family duties, that means finding ways to grow your career and support your organization that will not create excessive problems at home.

For instance, if entertaining a client after hours interferes with your partner’s dinner plans, consider volunteering to help onboard a new colleague or help with an extra project during regular working hours instead. Setting healthy boundaries and taking an active approach to growing your career on your own terms can help you achieve your professional goals in a manner that’s consistent with both your needs and the needs of those most important to you.

3. Recognize the power of communication.

You might think that taking on extra work is bound to upset your partner — but our research illustrates that how you communicate can have a major impact on how they react. Even if you don’t think of yourself as a great communicator, just using the right strategy can make a big difference. Specifically, to reduce the chances of conflict, try to avoid focusing on prior discussions, and instead do your best to provide early notice and frame the conversation around seeking permission to take on the extra work duties (rather than simply informing your partner).

To be sure, no one should feel like they have to ask their partner’s permission to grow their career. And in fact, our study demonstrated that requesting permission correlates with taking on less extra work — so for employees who are prioritizing career growth, this approach may not be optimal. However, when it comes to mitigating conflict, communication strategies that demonstrate your respect and appreciation for your partner (who may be taking on additional home or childcare duties as a result of your decision to pursue additional work) can make a big difference.

4. Align your communication strategy with your goals.

We all go through phases in which we are more focused on our personal or professional lives. The key is to adapt our behavior to fit our current goals. When your career is your top priority, it may make sense to use communication strategies that maximize your chances of taking on extra work (potentially at the cost of sowing some discontent at home): Emphasize the payoffs associated with going the extra mile, or invoke prior conversations with your partner. Conversely, if you’re most concerned with keeping your partner happy, it may make more sense to focus on seeking permission and providing early notice (though the former may result in you taking on less additional work in the office). And if you’re trying to balance both work and home life, our studies found that providing early notice helped improve partner satisfaction but had no impact on whether people ended up taking on extra tasks — so this approach may come closest to balancing the two goals. Ultimately, success is relative: Strategies that facilitate success at work may be less successful at home — and vice versa — so it’s important to determine what’s important to you, and choose the best communication strategy accordingly.

There’s no way around it: Being a good citizen at work can sometimes come at a cost for both employees and their partners. However, how you communicate with your partner when such situations arise can have important implications for both the work-family conflict you experience and your partner’s satisfaction, as well as for the likelihood that you’ll end up actually taking on the extra work. So next time you are called upon to go beyond the call of duty at work, take a moment to clarify your organization’s needs, look for creative ways to support your employer without causing problems at home, and before breaking the news to your partner, take a moment to choose the best communication strategy to match your unique context and goals.

Adblock test (Why?)


You're Working More. Here's How to Talk to Your Partner About It. - HBR.org Daily
Read More

Tuesday, July 5, 2022

More than half of Canada's AstraZeneca vaccine doses expired, will be thrown out - CTV News

OTTAWA -

Canada is about to toss more than half of its doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine because it couldn't find any takers for it either at home or abroad.

It also has yet to explain how it plans to manage millions of doses of both Novavax and Medicago vaccines that it bought but is unlikely to use itself.

Canada signed a contract with AstraZeneca in 2020 to get 20 million doses of its vaccine, and 2.3 million Canadians received at least one dose of it, mostly between March and June 2021.

Following concerns in the spring of 2021 about rare but potentially fatal blood clots from AstraZeneca, and with more ample supplies of the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, Canada moved away from using AstraZeneca. In July 2021, it promised to donate the rest of its procured supply, about 17.7 million doses.

In an emailed statement, Health Canada said "Canada made every effort" to make good on that promise, but 13.6 million doses earmarked for that have expired and will have to be thrown out.

"Due to limited demand for the vaccine and recipient country challenges with distribution and absorption, they were not accepted," the statement said.

In June 2021, Canada also said it would also donate 4.1 million doses of AstraZeneca it paid to get from the COVAX vaccine sharing alliance, but wouldn't need.

In total, Canada donated 8.9 million doses of AstraZeneca through bilateral agreements and its COVAX supply, to 21 countries, between Aug. 4, 2021, and March 25, 2022.

Dr. Bruce Aylward, an infectious diseases specialist originally from St. John's and now a senior adviser to the head of the World Health Organization, told The Canadian Press in a recent interview Canada's lack of confidence in AstraZeneca contributed to vaccine hesitancy globally.

He said countries like Canada first hoarded all vaccines, then rejected AstraZeneca and offered it to lower-income nations to fulfil their donation promises. Often those donations were made in large quantities close to their expiry dates.

A glut of doses of a vaccine people were hesitant to get in countries lacking the health workers and infrastructure to run a fast-paced and complex vaccination campaign, was the perfect storm for rejection and expiration.

"They've made it incredibly hard for political leaders in low-income countries to get coverage up," Aylward said.

About 85 per cent of Canadians are considered fully vaccinated, compared with 61 per cent of the world's population, and just 16 per cent of people living in the world's poorest countries.

Adam Houston, medical policy and advocacy officer for Doctors Without Borders in Canada, said that 75 per cent of the AstraZeneca doses Canada promised to donate are going to be thrown out "is extremely disappointing."

"This underscores how vaccines in press releases do not translate into vaccines in arms," he said. "Today, the global vaccine supply is no longer the main problem. But a year ago, it absolutely was. Had the actions of countries like Canada matched their rhetoric on vaccine equity from the beginning of the pandemic, less vaccine would have gone to waste, and far more importantly, more lives would have been saved."

Canada has also promised to donate 10 million doses each of Johnson & Johnson and Moderna. The former has had production issues, and Canada hasn't donated any of that vaccine. It donated 6.1 million doses of Moderna to four countries between December and June, but another 1.2 million doses of Moderna expired and have been thrown out in Canada.

NDP health critic Don Davies said it is "unacceptable" for doses to expire when millions of people still haven't received even a single shot.

"There is no excuse for such waste," Davies said.

He called on the federal government to finally release all the details of its contracts for vaccines, and its plan for using the doses.

Canada also signed contracts to get 52 million doses of Novavax's vaccine and 20 million from Medicago but is relying almost entirely now on Pfizer and Moderna.

Canada has received 3.2 million doses of Novavax so far, with no current plans for further deliveries. It hasn't received any Medicago but a spokeswoman said Canada is working with that company on a delivery schedule.

The World Health Organization authorized Novavax's vaccine for emergency use in December, and Health Canada in February. The contract allows for Canada to donate the doses of both, but there has been no confirmation that Canada intends to donate any of them.

Donating Medicago is more complex because the World Health Organization won't approve it for use by COVAX due to Medicago's financial ties to tobacco giant Philip Morris.

Neither Novavax nor Medicago responded to media inquiries Tuesday.

Adblock test (Why?)


More than half of Canada's AstraZeneca vaccine doses expired, will be thrown out - CTV News
Read More

Canada is 1st country to ratify requests from Sweden and Finland to join NATO - CBC News

Canada has become the first country to ratify Sweden's and Finland's requests to join NATO, bringing the two countries closer to full membership.

The Prime Minister's Office says Justin Trudeau met with Finland's president, Sauli Niinistö, and Sweden's prime minister, Magdalena Andersson, at the NATO summit last week.

In a statement, Trudeau said Canada champions the alliance's open door policy for any European country in a position to "advance the commitments and obligations of membership."

The Finnish and Swedish ambassadors submitted official letters of application to NATO on May 18, and Canada's federal cabinet issued orders-in-council on May 26 authorizing the foreign affairs minister to ratify accession protocols for both countries.

The House of Commons also voted unanimously this spring to support the membership bids.

Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky are seen during a joint news conference on Monday in Kyiv, Ukraine. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has spurred Sweden, along with Finland, to seek membership in the NATO military alliance after decades of neutrality. (Alexey Furman/Getty Images)

All 30 NATO allies signed off on the accession protocols for Sweden and Finland on Tuesday, sending the membership bids to the alliance countries for legislative approval.

Canada deliberately issued the orders-in-council on May 26 to speed through the ratification process and get it done within hours instead of the usual months.

The move further increases Russia's strategic isolation in the wake of its invasion of neighbouring Ukraine in February and its military struggles there since.

"This is truly a historic moment for Finland, for Sweden and for NATO," said alliance Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg.

The 30 ambassadors and permanent representatives formally approved the decisions of last week's NATO summit when the alliance made the historic decision to invite Russia's neighbour Finland and Scandinavian partner Sweden to join the military club.

Despite the agreement in the alliance, parliamentary approval in member state Turkey could still pose problems.

WATCH: NATO's expansion not assured, expert says

Sweden, Finland entry to NATO 'not done deal,' says defence expert

14 hours ago
Duration 6:09
Turkey's concerns over the extradition of dozens of Kurds from Sweden in particular could still block full ratification of Sweden and Finland's entry to NATO, says Andrew Rasiulis, a defence expert at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute.

Last week, Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned that Ankara could still block the process if the two countries fail to fully meet Turkey's demand to extradite terror suspects with links to outlawed Kurdish groups or the network of an exiled cleric accused of a failed 2016 coup in Turkey.

He said Turkey's Parliament could refuse to ratify the deal. It is a potent threat since NATO accession must be formally approved by all 30 member states, which gives each a blocking right.

Stoltenberg said he expected no change of heart. "There were security concerns that needed to be addressed," he said. "And we did what we always do at NATO. We found common ground."

Every alliance nation has different legislative challenges and procedures to deal with, and it could take several more months for the two to become official members.

"I look forward to a swift ratification process," said Finnish Foreign Minister Pekka Haavisto. 

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has given the process added urgency. It will ensconce the two nations in the Western military alliance and give NATO more clout, especially in the face of Moscow's military threat.

"We will be even stronger and our people will be even safer as we face the biggest security crisis in decades," said Stoltenberg.

Tuesday's signing-off does bring both nations deeper into NATO's fold already. As close partners, they already attended some meetings that involved issues that immediately affected them. As official invitees, they can attend all meetings of the ambassadors even if they do not yet have any voting rights.

Adblock test (Why?)


Canada is 1st country to ratify requests from Sweden and Finland to join NATO - CBC News
Read More

Monday, July 4, 2022

OPEC+ must produce more oil, says UK PM Johnson - Reuters.com

The logo of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is pictured on the wall of the new OPEC headquarters in Vienna March 16, 2010. REUTERS/Heinz-Peter Bader/File Photo

LONDON, July 4 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Monday OPEC+ must produce more oil to try to tackle a growing cost-of-living crisis and bring down prices.

"There is no doubt that we are going to need a lot more OPEC+ oil," he told parliament, referring to a group that includes Saudi Arabia, Russia and other major oil producers.

"The UK has ... strong and productive relations with Saudi Arabia. We need to make sure the whole of the West does as well," Johnson said, adding that Saudi Arabia needed to produce more oil.

Reporting by William James, writing by Elizabeth Piper

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Adblock test (Why?)


OPEC+ must produce more oil, says UK PM Johnson - Reuters.com
Read More

Opioids: Study finds poorest Canadians most at risk - CTV News

A new study looking at opioid deaths across Canada over 17 years has found that low-income Canadians are almost four times more likely to die from opioids than high-income Canadians.

Researchers from the University of Waterloo looked at opioid-related deaths and hospitalizations in Canada from 2000 to 2017 through a socioeconomic lens.

They found that not only were low-income Canadians more likely to die of opioids, the poorest Canadians also had five times the amount of visits to the emergency department due to opioids than the richest Canadians.

The results, published in June in the journal Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada, underline the stark gap between the risks facing the rich and the poor when opioids are involved, researchers say, and signal where policy changes can be made to help those who are the most vulnerable.

"Opioid-related harms are at a crisis level in Canada," Wasem Alsabbagh, a pharmacy professor at Waterloo and lead author of the study, said in a press release. "Opioid-related hospitalizations in Canada have increased by more than 50 per cent from 2007 to 2017. In Ontario, emergency department visits more than doubled. We explored the trends between socioeconomic status and opioid harms so that we can better understand how to address the opioid crisis.”

Researchers looked at mortality rates, hospitalizations and emergency department visits that were connected to opioid use, and cross-referenced with census data to get a picture of the median household income associated with patients’ neighbourhoods.

Income and population estimates came from the 2006 and 2016 census.

In total, researchers looked at more than 19,500 deaths, 82,000 hospitalizations and 71,000 visits to the emergency department, and compared them to five income brackets.

Across all opioid-related risks, those belonging to the lowest income bracket had the highest rate per million people in Canada, or per million in Ontario in the case of emergency department visits.

This means that the lower income a neighbourhood was, the more opioid deaths, hospitalizations and emergency department visits there were.

Experts say we can help mitigate these risks by targeting policies and support systems to lower income areas, such as safe injection sites.

In Timmins, Ont., a safe injection site called Safe Health Site Timmins is set to open its doors on Monday, and physicians there said they were not surprised by the study’s results.

“People with less income have less opportunities for health and wellbeing,” Dr. Liane Catton, a physician with the Porcupine Health Unit in Timmins, told CTV News Northern Ontario. “They tend to face greater inequities in terms of health and healthcare, and that does include social services, supports [for] mental health and addiction.”

Social services and public programs need to step up to fill the gap for those who do not have the ability to access certain mental health care or addiction services, experts say.

“The goal of this site is to reach those individuals who are the most challenging to reach, the most marginalized and vulnerable,” Dr. Louisa Marion-Bellemare, Timmins and District Hospital Addictions Lead, told CTV News Northern Ontario. “And those that aren’t sure really to how to even seek help or treatment for their addiction.”

The study did signal some progress. When looking at the risk of death from an opioid overdose, the dramatic gap between the rich and poor is lessening somewhat — researchers found that the difference in mortality rate between the lowest and highest incomes decreased between 2000 and 2017.

However, the disparity in regards to emergency department visits and hospitalization in that time period did not decrease.

And in 2017, Canadians in the lowest income areas were still almost 2.5 times more likely to die of opioid-related causes than those in high income areas.

"For many, socioeconomic status is a result of past experiences – families, neighbourhoods, education and other earlier life events, in addition to current access to material and social resources that help individuals cope with challenges," Alsabbagh said. "Often, we see low socioeconomic status in concentrated geographic areas where there is poorer access to resources. In addition, psychosocial factors, such as feeling marginalized or enduring discrimination and social isolation, can have an effect. By drawing the link between low socioeconomic status and opioid harm, we can design policies that more appropriately serve the needs of our communities."

With files from Lydia Chubak

Adblock test (Why?)


Opioids: Study finds poorest Canadians most at risk - CTV News
Read More

Lupus and other autoimmune diseases strike far more women than men. Now there's a clue why - CTV News

WASHINGTON - Women are far more likely than men to get autoimmune diseases, when an out-of-whack immune system attacks their own bodies -...