Rechercher dans ce blog

Thursday, January 5, 2023

The most obvious speaker solution is also the most radical - CNN

A version of this story appears in CNN’s What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.

CNN  — 

It’s the easiest, most elegant and simple solution to Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s failure to bring Republicans together.

Just find a few Democrats already. Form a freaking coalition. Edge out these hardline Republicans and get the House to work.

But ask just about anyone in Washington and they’ll chuckle at your naivete and shake their heads. McCarthy won’t ever ask Democrats for help. And Democrats wouldn’t give it to him. So silly.

Who can govern like this?

Which leaves the vast majority of Americans to watch as McCarthy gives more and more to the intransigent fringe of his party, even as it becomes painfully clear that more than four of them have no intention of ever supporting him. He can only afford to lose four GOP votes.

By the way, this is now the most drawn-out speaker election since the outbreak of the Civil War.

Meanwhile, if McCarthy was to finally give up and step aside, whichever Republican tried to find GOP consensus would be stuck with the concessions McCarthy has already agreed to.

Look to the states

While the idea of a bipartisan coalition feels impossible in today’s Washington, it’s not a crazy idea at all.

In fact, as CNN political analyst John Avlon pointed out on “CNN This Morning,” variations of power sharing or a moderate speaker upset could be seen in multiple states this year:

  • In Alaska, nine Democrats and eight Republicans have put aside their differences to form a bipartisan majority in the state Senate.
  • In Pennsylvania, a Democrat was named speaker of the state House after gaining support from Republicans. Following the vote, he announced he would govern as an independent.
  • In Ohio, a moderate Republican managed to assume the state House speaker position with the support of Democrats.

How would a coalition work?

Those are all unique situations with their own local dynamics, but it’s worth wondering what a coalition government in Washington might look like.

“A block of House Republicans should get together with Democrats to pick a speaker to run a coalition government, which will moderate the House and marginalize the extremists,” suggested John Kasich in a tweet that was viewed more than 5 million times. He’s the former Ohio governor and representative who has turned into a cheerleader for moderation in recent years.

Democrats would have to buy in

Kasich has seen this process before. He was chairman of the House Budget Committee after the so-called “Republican Revolution” of 1994 and took part in the famous budget balancing of the second Bill Clinton administration, when the Democratic president was forced to work with a Republican House majority.

“The Democrats at some point have got to stop laughing at the Republicans and say, ‘hey, we have a golden opportunity here to come up with something that is more moderate and more workable,’” Kasich later told CNN’s Michael Smerconish on his SiriusXM podcast.

Stop letting them ‘hold you hostage’

Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska is another Republican interested in finding some Democratic help. He told CNN’s Jim Sciutto on Wednesday that McCarthy may have to start looking across the aisle and perhaps give Democrats more committee members or other concessions in order to get the government running.

“If the small handful refuse to be part of the team, you cannot let them hold you hostage, and that’s what they’re doing right now,” Bacon said, suggesting a move to negotiate with Democrats would take power from the fringe. “They don’t think we have the wherewithal to do anything without them. We need to show them otherwise.”

Who could do it?

When Avlon suggested the idea of a bipartisan consensus-builder on CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront” on Wednesday, former Rep. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania agreed that it is indeed what would happen in a “functional Congress.”

“Now, the question is, do the Democrats want to play ball with Kevin McCarthy? My sense is right now they do not,” Dent said.

He’s right. Democrats have been happy to continue to support their new leader, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York, who, if elected, would be the first Black lawmaker to be House speaker.

McCarthy is so ingrained in the GOP machine and has spent so much time trying to contrast Republicans from former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democrats that he might not be the right person to form a consensus and coalition government.

The retired Republican Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan, who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump, has said he’s intrigued by the idea of being a consensus candidate for speaker and would give some concessions to Democrats to make the plan palatable. The Constitution does not require a current House member to be speaker.

Redefine the speaker rule

Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, the moderate Illinois Republican who was part of the House January 6 committee and is now a CNN contributor, pointed out to Burnett on Wednesday that the role of the speaker as a partisan leader is relatively new.

Speakers previously simply oversaw House proceedings. Perhaps Democrats could get on board with supporting a consensus Republican who is not trying to use the House for partisan purposes.

“I think the institution, and frankly the country, could use somebody sitting in that position simply saying, here is how the House is gonna work. Go debate,” Kinzinger said. As this roadblock drags on, he said, that kind of out-of-the-box solution could become more likely, “although still pretty unlikely.”

Bipartisanship is in this year

It’s also true that there’s some bipartisanship already in the air in Washington. President Joe Biden appeared with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Wednesday to announce new funding to rehab the deteriorating Brent Spence Bridge that ties McConnell’s home state of Kentucky to Kasich’s Ohio.

While the appearance was a photo op, it’s not the kind of thing you could have imagined McConnell doing with former President Barack Obama, who McConnell made it his mission to oppose on nearly every level.

Similarly, it would have been incredible to see Sen. Chuck Schumer, McConnell’s Democratic opposite in the Senate, appear with Trump.

Why not just do it? Count the reasons

As elegant as a bipartisan solution seems, it’s also completely far-fetched.

While the Republicans and Democrats who vote for the bipartisan option might be celebrated by the moderate middle of the American electorate, they’d be attacked by people deep in the party trenches, the politically engaged people who contribute to political campaigns.

There’s also the issue that members of Congress wait around for years for plum committee assignments. Jumping out of the system they know would jeopardize that.

But the biggest problem with the bipartisan solution is that McCarthy and Republicans just won their slim majority after an election in which they tried to separate themselves from Democrats. To join with them now would be awkward at best.

Yet, awkward might end up being the best option down the road if Republicans can’t figure it out on their own.

Adblock test (Why?)


The most obvious speaker solution is also the most radical - CNN
Read More

The GOP Is More Ungovernable Than Ever Before - New York Magazine

Photo: J Scott Applewhite/AP/Shutterstock

On one level, the chaos that’s presently consuming the GOP is so familiar as to be almost reassuring. Like birdsong announcing the return of spring, the braying of far-right backbenchers heralds a new Republican House majority. The Earth’s cycles remain unbroken, the universe’s laws unchanged.

In reality, however, the Republican civil war represents something new. The party’s inability to elect Kevin McCarthy as its Speaker indicates that it is more ungovernable than ever before.

For decades, whenever Republicans have secured midterm victories during Democratic presidencies, the party’s newfound House majority has proceeded to squabble over precisely how thoroughly the GOP should ignore the limits on its popular support and constitutional authority. Under Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich sought to coerce the Democratic Party into slashing Medicare and capital-gains taxes by shutting down the government, much to the consternation of some moderate Republicans. Under Barack Obama, the tea party tried to force the Affordable Care Act’s repeal by threatening to drive the U.S. government into default.

Today, 20 conservative hard-liners are threatening to kill McCarthy’s bid for House Speaker, ostensibly because they believe he has historically been willing to reach legislative compromises with Democrats in order to keep the government running — or, in hard-liners’ parlance, to “fund the woke and weaponized government leviathan.”

The perennial extremism and obstinacy of the House GOP’s far-right gadflies — and the Republican leadership’s inability to discipline them — partly reflect structural changes in U.S. politics that have undermined the authority of both parties’ Establishments.

In the wake of the Democratic Party’s fractious 1968 convention, popular pressure led both parties to outsource their nomination processes almost entirely to primary voters, a development that gave the news media and ideological activists more influence over each party’s internal governance — and party bosses far less. Meanwhile, campaign-finance laws enacted following the Watergate scandal tightly restricted the amount of money that donors could give to the major parties. Rather than getting big money out of politics, however, these reforms merely transferred such money away from the parties themselves and toward (even more democratically unaccountable) corporate and ideological PACs. As a result, backbenchers became less vulnerable to the whims of party leaders and more amenable to the appeals of business interests and wealthy ideologues.

Meanwhile, over the past three decades, the rise of right-talk-radio juggernauts such as Rush Limbaugh and major conservative outlets like Fox News created further alternative power centers to the Republican leadership. These right-wing-media institutions had distinct incentives from the GOP. Whereas Republicans must appeal to a mass electorate, Fox News and Limbaugh served niche audiences that were both far more conservative and politically engaged than the median voter. And while internecine warfare is bad for party governance, it’s quite good for ratings: The media exists to tell stories, and you can’t have a compelling narrative without conflict.

Put together a messy, ideological media that lives for drama, a sovereign primary electorate, and myriad PACs offering independent campaign financing and you end up with unruly backbenchers and weak party Establishments.

This is all old news, of course. Since 2016, at the latest, it’s been clear that Red America is a failed state with no stable leadership, only warring tribes fighting to fill a power vacuum. Nevertheless, the present battle over McCarthy’s Speakership bid suggests that power within the contemporary GOP is even more radically decentralized than previously thought.

For the first time in 100 years, the House failed to elect a Speaker on its first ballot this week. As of this writing, five subsequent votes have yet to produce a new leader for Congress’s lower chamber. What’s remarkable about this stalemate isn’t that the GOP leadership has failed to corral the votes of 20 rank-and-file conservatives; it’s that the combined force of Fox News, Donald Trump, and right-wing talk radio has failed to do so too.

On Wednesday morning, Trump told his followers on Truth Social, “Kevin McCarthy will do a good job, and maybe even a GREAT JOB — JUST WATCH!,” adding, “It’s now time for all of our GREAT Republican House Members to VOTE FOR KEVIN, CLOSE THE DEAL, TAKE THE VICTORY, & WATCH CRAZY NANCY PELOSI FLY BACK HOME TO A VERY BROKEN CALIFORNIA.”

Behind the scenes, Trump has been working the phones for McCarthy, encouraging his ostensible loyalists in the rebel faction to toe the party line. The former president has been joined in that endeavor by some other leading lights of the MAGA movement such as House representatives Jim Jordan and Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Fox News’ prime-time hosts largely followed Trump’s lead on Tuesday night. Sean Hannity implored the House GOP to rally behind McCarthy so that its investigations of the Biden administration and FBI can begin. Laura Ingraham, meanwhile, noted that the House rebels’ intransigence threatened to hand the Speakership to a Democrat. Even Tucker Carlson, heretofore an anti-McCarthyite, encouraged the would-be Speaker and conservative hard-liners to cut a deal.

Fox News’ rival conservative channel, Newsmax, has been no less supportive of McCarthy’s bid. On Wednesday, the network’s website portrayed the conservative rebels as traitors willing to throw House control to the Democrats while spotlighting Trump’s endorsement of McCarthy. Even Breitbart’s coverage of the fight has been relatively neutral. On the radio, right-wing host Mark Levin has denounced the hard-liners as “saboteurs.”

Nevertheless, Matt Gaetz & Co. persisted.

Photo: NEWSMAX

It is one thing for Republican backbenchers to humiliate their party in defiance of its leadership; it is another for them to do so in defiance of the GOP Establishment, Donald Trump, and the bulk of the conservative media. In the past, the Republicans’ internecine feuds pitted the party’s disparate power centers against one another. In the current feud, however, all of the right’s major institutions are aligned behind McCarthy. And roughly 20 House Republicans feel comfortable defying their party anyway.

This intransigence is all the more extraordinary when one considers how little is actually at stake. There are no profound ideological divisions between Gaetz and (McCarthy supporter) Taylor Greene. Electing Steve Scalise or Andy Biggs or any other House Republican Speaker will not change the fact that Democrats control the Senate and the presidency and, therefore, that the conservative agenda cannot be implemented at the present time. The rebels do have official demands. But these are so outlandish as to call into question their sincerity; the House is not going to create a new legal entity that empowers the Freedom Caucus to unilaterally wage lawsuits.

In truth, it might be this very pointlessness that has rendered the GOP’s civil war so difficult to resolve. The House’s conservative hard-liners may be less interested in any particular outcome than they are in the chaos itself; their means may be their end. Placing oneself at the center of a days-long national news firestorm attracts attention to one’s social-media feeds, and that attention can eventually be monetized in all manner of ways. As Puck’s Tara Palmeri notes, far-right congressman Biggs has been raking in campaign contributions on the strength of his “Speakership revolt antics.”

Indeed, the simultaneous ascent of social media and small-dollar online fundraising is likely responsible for the present mutiny. In the first decade of this century, a conservative representative who earned the ire of party leadership and Fox News and major right-wing PACs would have had a difficult time reaching a mass audience or raising campaign cash. Today, Twitter provides Gaetz with a captive audience of 2 million people, a significant minority of whom will click on whatever digital fundraising appeals he sends their way.

Beyond providing congressional provocateurs with an independent fundraising base, social media also provides them with a plethora of options for cashing in on their own intransigence-induced celebrity, should they decide to return to the private sector. Torpedoing McCarthy’s career might not advance the conservative movement’s substantive goals. But it could help a relatively obscure Republican House member secure national attention and, thus, social-media followers to whom he or she can later sell books or supplements.

Centrifugal forces have been undermining major party Establishments for half a century now. But digital media’s ongoing fragmentation of popular attention has turbocharged those forces and, at least on the right, produced both a radically decentralized power structure and a ton of perverse incentives for low-level Republican lawmakers.

All of this is good for the quality of C-SPAN’s content. For the quality of governance in the world’s most powerful nation, however, it seems a bit less auspicious.

See All

Adblock test (Why?)


The GOP Is More Ungovernable Than Ever Before - New York Magazine
Read More

Wednesday, January 4, 2023

Amazon will lay off more than 18,000 workers - CNN

New York CNN  — 

Amazon says it plans to lay off more than 18,000 employees as the global economic outlook continues to worsen.

Several teams will be affected, including the human resources department and Amazon Stores, according to a memo from CEO Andy Jassy shared with employees.

“Companies that last a long time go through different phases. They’re not in heavy people expansion mode every year,” he said.

Jassy had said in November that job cuts at the e-commerce giant would continue into early 2023. Multiple outlets reported in the fall that Amazon had planned to cut around 10,000 employees.

Amazon and other tech firms significantly ramped up hiring over the past couple of years as the pandemic shifted consumers’ habits toward e-commerce.

Now, many of these seemingly untouchable tech companies are experiencing whiplash and laying off thousands of workers as people return to pre-pandemic habits and macroeconomic conditions deteriorate.

Jassy, in his memo, said Amazon’s executives recently met to determine how to slim down the company and prioritize “what matters most to customers and the long-term health of our businesses.”

“This year’s review has been more difficult given the uncertain economy and that we’ve hired rapidly over the last several years,” he added.

The layoffs will help Amazon pursue long-term opportunities with a stronger cost structure, Jassy said. But he called the cuts a “difficult decision,” noting he is “deeply aware that these role eliminations are difficult for people, and we don’t take these decisions lightly or underestimate how much they might affect the lives of those who are impacted.”

The company will start informing affected staff from January 18, he added.

Amazon’s business initially boomed during the pandemic, as consumers relied on online shopping for just about everything.

This year, however, the company is confronting a shift back to in-person shopping as well as surging inflation that has sharply reduced consumers’ demand.

In October, Amazon disappointed Wall Street with a holiday season forecast that woefully missed analysts’ expectations. The company’s stock fell about 50% last year.

Like Jassy, a number of other tech founders and CEOs have since admitted they failed to accurately gauge pandemic demand.

Facebook-parent Meta recently announced 11,000 job cuts, the largest in the company’s history. Twitter also announced widespread job cuts after Elon Musk bought the company for $44 billion.

Salesforce this week said it would cut 10% of its staff.

Adblock test (Why?)


Amazon will lay off more than 18,000 workers - CNN
Read More

Tuesday, January 3, 2023

Tesla shares tumble more than 12% following deliveries report - CNBC

In this article

Shares of Tesla closed down 12% on Tuesday, a day after the electric auto maker reported fourth-quarter vehicle production and delivery numbers for 2022 that fell shy of analysts' expectations and the company's stated goals.

Deliveries are the closest approximation of sales disclosed by Tesla. The company reported 405,278 total deliveries for the quarter and 1.31 million total deliveries for the year. The full year numbers represented a record for the Elon Musk-led automaker and growth of 40% in deliveries compared to 2021.

But according to a consensus of analysts' estimates compiled by FactSet, as of Dec. 31, 2022, Wall Street was expecting Tesla to report around 427,000 deliveries for the final quarter of the year. Estimates updated in December, and included in the FactSet consensus, ranged from 409,000 to 433,000.

Shares of Tesla suffered a yearlong sell-off in 2022, prompting CEO Musk to tell employees in late December not to be "too bothered by stock market craziness."

Musk has blamed Tesla's declining share price in part on rising interest rates. But critics point to his rocky $44 billion Twitter takeover as another big culprit. Musk sold tens of billions of dollars of his Tesla shares last year, in part, to finance the leveraged buyout.

Some Wall Street analysts think that Tesla's deliveries miss, which followed aggressive discounting by Tesla in China and the US, spells trouble for the electric vehicle maker, but others see a buying opportunity.

New Model Y electric vehicles are picked up by a truck from the Tesla Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg plant by US electric carmaker Tesla. Tesla says it currently employs more than 7000 people at its Grünheide plant.
Patrick Pleul | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

Toni Sacconaghi at Bernstein sees Tesla "facing a significant demand problem," in 2023.

He wrote in a note on Monday, "Tesla's annual order run rate in Q4 including significant discounting was only about 1M units, and the company's target is to sell close to 2M units in 2023. We expect demand challenges persisting in 2023." He noted that no Tesla models appear to currently qualify for any Inflation Reduction Act rebates except the 7-seat version of the company's Model Y. The 7-seat option costs about $3000.

He added, "We believe Tesla will need to either reduce its growth targets (and run its factories below capacity) or sustain and potentially increase price cuts globally, pressuring margins."

Analysts at Goldman Sachs said they consider the delivery report to be an "incremental negative," and view Tesla as a company that is "well positioned for long-term growth." Goldman reiterated its buy rating on the stock in a Monday note and said that making vehicles more affordable in a challenging macroeconomic environment will be a "key driver of growth."

"We believe key debates from here will be on whether vehicle deliveries can reaccelerate, margins and Tesla's brand," the analysts said.

But Baird analyst Ben Kallo, who recently named Tesla a top pick for 2023, maintained an outperform rating and said he would remain a buyer of the stock ahead of the company's earnings report, which is scheduled for Jan. 25.

"Q4 deliveries missed consensus but beat our estimates," he said in a Tuesday note. "Importantly, production increased ~20% q/q which we expect to continue into 2023 as gigafactories in Berlin and Austin continue to ramp."

Morgan Stanley analysts said they think Tesla share price weakness is a "window of opportunity to buy."

"Between a worsening macro backdrop, record high unaffordability, and increasing competition, there are hurdles for all auto companies to overcome in the year ahead," they said in a note Tuesday. "However, within this backdrop we believe TSLA has the potential to widen its lead in the EV race, as it leverages its cost and scale advantages to further itself from the competition."

— CNBC's Lora Kolodny and Michael Bloom contributed to this report.

Adblock test (Why?)


Tesla shares tumble more than 12% following deliveries report - CNBC
Read More

Apple and Amazon lost a 'staggering' $800 billion in market cap in 2022. Here's what that looks like - CNBC

In this article

Sometimes a little perspective is needed to really drive home the magnitude of a specific statistic. That's the case with the gigantic losses tallied by Apple and Amazon last year.

The two stocks were the biggest losers of market cap in 2022. Apple shed $846.34 billion in value and Amazon lost $834.06 billion. Market cap measures the combined value of all of a company's stock.

The value shed by each of the two companies dwarfs the total size of other household tech stocks. Bespoke Investment Group called the numbers "staggering" in a tweet.

Amazon's stock sunk as the company's earnings floundered and fourth-quarter guidance was dispiriting. Its performance was in line with the tech sector more broadly, which has been hurt by rising interest rates, slowing internet advertising and other factors.

Despite being one of the few big tech names to avoid an earnings plunge, Apple still struggled as questions swirled around the popularity of its new products and it faced difficulty with iPhone 14 shipments during the holiday season due to Covid-19 restrictions at its main China factory.

The personal tech titan also has slowed the pace of hiring along with others in the sector as concerns grew over a potential recession, which could dilute demand as consumers delay purchases of big-ticket items to save money. Apple stock shed 3.7% in trading Tuesday — hitting a 52-week low as its market cap fell below $2 trillion for the first time since May.

But what can get lost in the data is just how large these two companies are within the stock market. Compared with peer Meta Platforms' $315.56 billion year-end market cap, Amazon was more than twice the size at $856.94 billion. On Dec. 30, Apple was multiple times that size at $2.067 trillion.

In fact, what each of the two stocks shed in one year alone is more than double the size of Meta's complete market cap.

That $830 billion loss alone is the equivalent of

Adblock test (Why?)


Apple and Amazon lost a 'staggering' $800 billion in market cap in 2022. Here's what that looks like - CNBC
Read More

Monday, January 2, 2023

Insider notebook: Aaron Long sweepstakes, Ronaldo's talks with SKC & more | MLSSoccer.com - MLSsoccer.com

Aaron Long decision expected soon
Houston Dynamo finalizing deal for Brad Smith
Sporting KC's chase for Cristiano Ronaldo
Charlotte sign English midfielder Ashley Westwood
Fire finalizing deal to sign French RB
Vancouver finalizing deal for Uruguayan CB
MLS Insider: Tom Bogert

Insider notebook: Aaron Long sweepstakes, Ronaldo's talks with SKC & more

USMNT: 3 New Year's resolutions that must be tackled in 2023

The Daily Kickoff

Your Monday Kickoff: NYCFC continue to part with key players

MLS Insider: Tom Bogert

Source: Charlotte FC sign Burnley midfielder Ashley Westwood

National Writer: Charles Boehm

2023 Soccer Almanac: Key dates & tournaments in busy year ahead

Transfer Tracker

LAFC sign rising Croatian forward Stipe Biuk

MLS SuperDraft 2023

MLS Transfer Rumors & SuperDraft Preview

The BIGGEST offseason question for every team in MLS

MLS free agent market heating up! Who will end up where?

MLS Season Pass. Coming February 1.

The new home for MLS is here! In a historic first for sports, fans can stream every single MLS match through the Apple TV app, without any local blackouts or restrictions.

Adblock test (Why?)


Insider notebook: Aaron Long sweepstakes, Ronaldo's talks with SKC & more | MLSSoccer.com - MLSsoccer.com
Read More

Russia's war in Ukraine: Live updates - CNN

A Russian defence ministry spokesperson talks about the Makiivka shelling in Moscow, Russia, on January 2.
A Russian defence ministry spokesperson talks about the Makiivka shelling in Moscow, Russia, on January 2. (Russian Defence Ministry/Reuters)

An apparent Ukrainian strike in Russian-occupied eastern Ukraine appears to have killed a large number of Russian troops housed next to an ammunition cache, according to the Ukrainian military, pro-Russian military bloggers and former officials.

According to both Ukrainian and pro-Russian accounts, the strike took place just after midnight on Sunday, New Year’s Day, on a vocational school housing Russian conscripts in Makiivka, in the Donetsk region.

The attack has led to vocal criticism of the Russian military from pro-Russian military bloggers, who claimed that the troops lacked protection and were reportedly being quartered next to a large cache of ammunition, which is said to have exploded when Ukrainian HIMARS rockets hit the school.

The Ukrainian military claimed that around 400 Russian soldiers were killed and 300 were wounded, without directly acknowledging a role. CNN cannot independently confirm those numbers or the weapons used in the strike. Some pro-Russian military bloggers have also estimated that the number of dead and wounded could run in the hundreds.

The Russian Ministry of Defense on Monday acknowledged the attack and claimed that “63 Russian servicemen” died. 

Video reportedly from the scene of the attack is circulating widely on Telegram, including on an official Ukrainian military channel. It shows a pile of smoking rubble, in which almost no part of the building appears to be standing.

“Greetings and congratulations” to the separatists and conscripts who “were brought to the occupied Makiivka and crammed into the building of vocational school,” the Strategic Communications Directorate of the Chief Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine said on Telegram. “Santa packed around 400 corpses of [Russian soldiers] in bags.”

The Russian Ministry of Defense said that the Ukrainian attack used HIMARS rockets. 

Daniil Bezsonov, a former official in the Russia-backed Donetsk administration, said on Telegram that “apparently, the high command is still unaware of the capabilities of this weapon.”

A Russian propagandist who blogs about the war effort on Telegram, Igor Girkin, claimed that the building was almost completely destroyed by the secondary detonation of ammunition stores. 

Girkin has long decried Russian generals whom he claims direct the war effort far from the frontline. Girkin was previously minister of defense of the self-proclaimed, Russian-backed Donetsk People's Republic, and was found guilty by a Dutch court of mass murder for his involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over eastern Ukraine in 2014. 

Sergey Markov, another pro-Russian military blogger, said there was “a great deal of sloppiness” on the part of the Russian command.

Boris Rozhin, who also blogs about the war effort under the nickname Colonelcassad, said that “incompetence and an inability to grasp the experience of war continue to be a serious problem.”

Adblock test (Why?)


Russia's war in Ukraine: Live updates - CNN
Read More

Lupus and other autoimmune diseases strike far more women than men. Now there's a clue why - CTV News

WASHINGTON - Women are far more likely than men to get autoimmune diseases, when an out-of-whack immune system attacks their own bodies -...